Direto, Poder e Liberdade I: Temas Atuais de Filosofia Política e Teoria do Direito (DFD5925 )

Objetivos:
OBJETIVOS: O objetivo desta disciplina é permitir leituras dirigidas e rigorosas de textos que tratem de temas atuais da interseção entre direito e filosofia política, isto é, dos fundamentos jurídicos e filosóficos de liberdades fundamentais e das condições para o exercício legítimo de poder. O programa do curso variará a cada oferecimento, e poderá adotar características monográficas (uma obra e seus comentadores), como também focar um debate específico à luz de múltiplos textos de referência. Assim, seu propósito é tanto metodológico (um treino para a leitura de textos filosóficos completos), quanto de conteúdo (uma apresentação do estado da arte de debates sobre temas contemporâneos relevantes).

Bibliografia:
BERNSTEIN, Richard. Violence: Thinking Without Banisters. Cambridge (UK): Polity, 2013.
BROWNLEE, Kimberley. The Civil Disobedience of Edward Snowden: Reply to William Scheuerman, Philosophy and Social Criticism (2016): http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0191453716631167
______. Conscience and Conviction: The Case for Civil Disobedience. Oxford University Press, 2012.
BROWNLEE, Kimberley; CHILD, Richard, Can the Law Help Us to Be Moral? (June 25, 2012). Warwick School of Law Research Paper No. 2012/17. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2091080
DICKSON, Julie, Is Bad Law Still Law? Is Bad Law Really Law? (October 6, 2008). Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 39/2008. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1279599 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1279599
DWORKIN. Religion Without God. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2013.
______. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011.
______. Justice in Robes. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press, 2006.
______. Sovereign Virtue: the theory and practice of equality. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2002.
______. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2001.
______. A matter of principle. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Univ Press, 2000.
______. Law’s Empire. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1995.
GREEN, Leslie. The Forces of Law: Duty, Coercion and Power (March 31, 2015). Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12/2015. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2588588 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2588588
______. Law and the Role of a Judge (September 13, 2014). Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 47/2014. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2495953 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2495953
______. The Morality in Law (February 24, 2013). Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12/2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2223760 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2223760
______. Should Law Improve Morality? Criminal Law and Philosophy, n. 7, p.473–494, 2013. DOI 10.1007/s11572-013-9248-3
HART, Herbert. The concept of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
______. Essays in jurisprudence and philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
______. Law, Liberty, and Morality. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1963.
HIMMA, Kenneth. The Authorization of Coercive Enforcement Mechanisms as a Conceptually Necessary Feature of Law
______. A Comprehensive Hartian Theory of Legal Obligation: Social Pressure, Coercive Enforcement, and the Legal Obligations of Citizens. In: W. WALUCHOW, S. SCIARAFFA, eds The Nature of Law: Contemporary Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013 .https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID2141033_code328842.pdf?abstractid=2141033&type=2
______. Law’s Claim of Legitimate Authority. In: J. COLEMAN, The Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to the Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID928095_code328842.pdf?abstractid=928095
POSTEMA, Gerald. Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Common Law World. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.
______. The Normativity of Law. In: R. GAVISON (ed.), Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy: The Influence of H.L.A. Hart. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987, pp. 81- 104.
______. Collective Evils, Harm, and the Law. Ethics, vol. 97, pp. 414-40, 1987.
______. Public Practical Reason: Political Practice, NOMOS XXXVII: Theory and
Practice, I. Shapiro and J. Wagner DeCew, eds. New York: New York University
Press, 1995, pp. 345-85.
______. Public Faces — Private Places: Liberalism and the Enforcement of Morals. In: A.W. Musschenga, A. Soeteman, B.Voorzanger (eds.), Morality, Worldview, and Law. Assen: Van Gorcum Publishers, p. 153-75, 1992.
RAZ, Joseph. Between Authority and Interpretation: on the Theory of Law and Practical Reason. Oxford: OUP, 2009.
______. Value, respect, and attachment. Cambridge : Cambridge UP, 2004.
______. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: OUP, 1996.
______. The Authority of Law. Oxford: OUP 1979.
SCHAUER, Frederick. The Force of Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP, 2015.